I’m going to channel Stan Lee and insist on going full bore with hyphens. Reread is an ugly word, difficult to parse. Re-read is clumsy, but has the benefit of clarity.
Re-reading books has its pleasures and its pitfalls. The pleasure comes in re-reading a much-loved book, rediscovering its charms, taking away a new insight each time. As with most life-long readers, I have re-read numerous books through the years. Willa Cather’s My Antonia, for example, is a book I return to every other year or so.
Walter Wangerin’s Book of the Dun Cow and Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings trilogy are also books I cherish and re-visit regularly.
A pandemic offers little opportunity to browse local bookstores, and on-line purchases have limited appealed. Fortunately, I have thousands of books here at home and maintain a list of books I have entertained re-reading.
Here’s where the pitfalls appear. Whether a decades-old sci-fi novel or a classic of English literature, some books simply don’t hold up well.
Sci-fi of the ‘50s and ‘60s tends to be outdated. Predictions fall wide of the mark and cultural advances leave some older texts feeling awkward and tone deaf, i.e. a husband jocularly threatening to spank his wife for lack of obedience. Women, in these older works, are rarely fully drawn, appearing as stereotypes — the Madonna, the prostitute with a heart of gold, the shrewish wife, the empty-headed blonde.
When I was a kid, Simak was one of my favorite sci-fi writers. I can’t say that now. The same is true for Heinlein. I did find The Puppet Masters mildly humorous compared to the horror it evoked when I first read it at 14. And I was pleased to see that a line I vividly remembered from that first decades-old read was just as I remembered it, and still carried a frisson of horror.
Admittedly a newer work, Gibson’s The Peripheral was fine. I primarily re-read it to set up Gibson’s newest novel, Agency. Gibson is always worth a spin around the block.
By its nature, fantasy avoids the problems inherent in sci-fi. Bradbury’s book was mesmerizing. MacDonald’s eerie and with its magic duels and court intrigue, Kurtz’s novel — her first — was just plain fun.
Among all these books, only Catch 22 fell flat. A satirical look at war and the military, it felt like a one-trick pony. It was clever, until it wasn’t.
I’m curious how broadly read Ken Kesey is today. I found One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest was a powerful, insightful book that warrants a wider audience. Perhaps a new generation will discover this merry prankster. (Year ago, I read Kesey’s Sometimes A Great Notion, and loved it. I need to track down a copy and re-read it this year.)
Slaughterhouse Five, They Things They Carried and The Long Ships cemented their status as favorite books. (Note: Anyone who is a fan of Bernard Cornwell’s The Last Kingdom series is advised encouraged to read The Long Ships.)
I plan to re-read more books from my home library. Pleasures and disappointments await.